- From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
- Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 14:36:52 -0700
- To: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
- CC: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com>, IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>, Jan Algermissen <jan.algermissen@nordsc.com>, URI <uri@w3.org>, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
+1 On 10/23/12 2:32 PM, James M Snell wrote: > It should be quite clear to everyone that the horse is quite dead at > this point. Any further beating is entirely unnecessary. So let's wrap > it up with this: the whatwg's spec language around urls has the > potential to cause confusion among implementers, so please consider > reworking that language to avoid such confusion. Period, end of story.
Received on Tuesday, 23 October 2012 21:37:21 UTC