W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > uri@w3.org > October 2012

Re: [whatwg] New URL Standard from Anne van Kesteren on 2012-09-24 (public-whatwg-archive@w3.org from September 2012)

From: Jan Algermissen <jan.algermissen@nordsc.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 23:51:12 +0200
Cc: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>, URI <uri@w3.org>, IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <15E1D98B-8883-4936-81A9-174E1323683C@nordsc.com>
To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>

On Oct 23, 2012, at 11:34 PM, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote:

>  Let's in fact try: Hi guys, we need to fix STD 66 
> because it doesn't define error handling. 

Help me, I am just not getting it:

Why do you insist on 'fixing STD 66'?

What is the reason you are not willing to reframe the problem to 'fixing how we get from the provided string -the input to the reference construction process- to a STD-66-valid result'?

To me this is really what you are aiming at and dropping the 'fix the URI spec' language would get everyone on board immediately in my perception.

Received on Tuesday, 23 October 2012 21:51:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:25:16 UTC