Kristof Zelechovski wrote: > 1. The document "Converting New URI Schemes or URN Sub-Schemes to HTTP" > [1] specifically addresses the use case where the custom URL is presented to > a casual user. > > Since there are no legitimate casual users of the Web > Sockets protocol that is designed to be used by Web applications only, I disagree. ws:// URLs *will* be entered on web forms at some point, you can count on it. Someone will write a web form that says something like "Tell me the address of a FOOCHAT server to begin your FOOCHAT session", expecting a ws:// URL to be entered if WebSockets is the protocol to be used. That's a legitimate use. -- JamieReceived on Wednesday, 12 August 2009 02:20:22 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Sunday, 10 October 2021 22:17:52 UTC