Re: [Uri-review] ws: and wss: schemes

On Fri, 2009-08-07 at 21:30 -0400, Daniel R. Tobias wrote:
> On 7 Aug 2009 at 9:16, David Booth wrote:
> > Note that I am talking about the *scheme*, not the protocol.  In
> > essence, a URI prefix such as "http://wss.example/" can be defined that
> > would serve the same purpose as a "wss:" scheme: an agent that
> > recognizes this prefix will know to attempt the WSS protocol.
> It seems like a bad idea to me, to have to build special exceptions 
> to how a user agent processes URIs, where the protocol specified in 
> the URI isn't actually the one that is used, based on "magic strings" 
> within other parts than the scheme.

I can't see that as a significant issue, as there is only a trivial
difference between dispatching based on the string prefix
"http://wss.example/" and the string prefix "wss:".  Both are simple,
constant strings and both are equally "magic": they cause agent to
attempt the WSS protocol.

David Booth, Ph.D.
Cleveland Clinic (contractor)

Opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily
reflect those of Cleveland Clinic.

Received on Monday, 10 August 2009 01:52:46 UTC