- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2009 08:01:34 +0200
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- CC: uri-review@ietf.org, uri@w3.org, hybi@ietf.org
Ian Hickson wrote: > The formal registrations for the ws: and wss: schemes, part of the Web > Socket protocol, will be available in the Web Socket protocol ID as soon > as the IETF upload process completes: > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hixie-thewebsocketprotocol#section-7 Looking at: > 7.1. Registrarion of ws: scheme > > > URI scheme name. > ws > > Status. > Permanent. > > URI scheme syntax. > "ws" ":" hier-part [ "?" query ] I assume you are using ABNF syntax (RFC5234) and terminology from the URI spec, but you really need to state that. > URI scheme semantics. > The only operation for this scheme is to open a connection using > the Web Socket protocol. > > Encoding considerations. > UTF-8 only. What does this mean? > Applications/protocols that use this URI scheme name. > Web Socket protocol. > > Interoperability considerations. > None. > > Security considerations. > See "Security considerations" section above. > > Contact. > Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> > > Author/Change controller. > Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> > ... I believe that for a permanent registry on the standards track, change control will have to move to IETF or IESG. BR, Julian
Received on Friday, 7 August 2009 06:02:25 UTC