- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 07:36:39 +1000
- To: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>
- Cc: Stefan Eissing <stefan.eissing@greenbytes.de>, URI <uri@w3.org>, Joe Gregorio <joe@bitworking.org>
Sorry, typo; that should be "2K" (although I think 1K will be achieved before too long). Cheers, On 17/10/2007, at 7:11 AM, Mark Nottingham wrote: > > > On 17/10/2007, at 3:06 AM, Roy T. Fielding wrote: > >>> Ceterum censeo: in my view the templates would benefit from an >>> easier readable syntax. >> >> Easy to read by whom? I went through the readable bits with HTTP >> and it turned out to be a big mistake. Nobody reads HTTP in real >> practice, yet the overhead of parsing HTTP messages is huge. > > I do, and my developers do; it greatly helps them understand and > debug the protocol. > > WRT parsing overhead -- commodity hardware can easily saturate a > gigabit Ethernet with 1K responses to GETs. "Huge" is an > overstatement. > > Cheers, > > -- > Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/ > > -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Tuesday, 16 October 2007 21:38:36 UTC