On 17/10/2007, at 3:06 AM, Roy T. Fielding wrote: >> Ceterum censeo: in my view the templates would benefit from an >> easier readable syntax. > > Easy to read by whom? I went through the readable bits with HTTP > and it turned out to be a big mistake. Nobody reads HTTP in real > practice, yet the overhead of parsing HTTP messages is huge. I do, and my developers do; it greatly helps them understand and debug the protocol. WRT parsing overhead -- commodity hardware can easily saturate a gigabit Ethernet with 1K responses to GETs. "Huge" is an overstatement. Cheers, -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/Received on Tuesday, 16 October 2007 21:13:52 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Sunday, 10 October 2021 22:17:50 UTC