- From: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 13:36:37 -0700
- To: Joe Gregorio <joe@bitworking.org>
- CC: uri@w3.org
FWIW, I've been doing some testing on this and it would appear that the only significant changes we would need to make to handle IRI's would be to replace unreserved with iunreserved. That is, rather than pct-encoding anything outside unreserved, we would pct-encoded anything outside of iunreserved. This would also apply to <arg>, which would need to be extended to allow for iunreserved characters. Beyond that, I think everything else would remain the same. - James Joe Gregorio wrote: >[snip] > 10. No specification for how to handle IRIs beyond "Turn an IRI Template > into a URI Template and then proceed." >[snip]
Received on Tuesday, 16 October 2007 20:36:52 UTC