- From: Stefan Eissing <stefan.eissing@greenbytes.de>
- Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 11:33:47 +0200
- To: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
- Cc: Mike Schinkel <mikeschinkel@gmail.com>, uri@w3.org
Am 15.10.2007 um 21:46 schrieb James M Snell: > I would much rather define a limited core set of <op>'s that cover the > most basic and most common cases and include in that set a special > <op> > code that indicates that the remainder of the token is going to be in > some application-specific or extension syntax. Yes, that was the gist of my proposal. What exact syntax that should be is not a priority as long as it is readable. The current proposals looked a bit perl-ish, so I dared to provide an different approach. And i think it would be cool to associate template functions with http resources which give the same value. //Stefan -- Stefan Eissing <green/>bytes GmbH Hafenweg 16 D-48155 Münster Germany Amtsgericht Münster: HRB5782
Received on Tuesday, 16 October 2007 09:34:00 UTC