- From: Mike Schinkel <mikeschinkel@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 01:53:45 -0400
- To: "'Joe Gregorio'" <joe@bitworking.org>
- Cc: "'URI'" <uri@w3.org>
Joe Gregorio wrote: > The 'listjoin' operator, <&>, is the part of my proposal that > I feel the least comfortable with, as it ends up introducing 'types' > into the grammar. I would argue that _everything_ can be represented by two types: strings and lists of string; Everything else can be represented either in a string or a list of strings (with the possible exception of dictionaries, but I won't go there.) Since these two types are so fundamental I'd argue they are both worthy of inclusion. -- -Mike Schinkel http://www.mikeschinkel.com/blogs/ http://www.welldesignedurls.org http://atlanta-web.org
Received on Tuesday, 16 October 2007 05:54:10 UTC