Joe Gregorio wrote: > The 'listjoin' operator, <&>, is the part of my proposal that > I feel the least comfortable with, as it ends up introducing 'types' > into the grammar. I would argue that _everything_ can be represented by two types: strings and lists of string; Everything else can be represented either in a string or a list of strings (with the possible exception of dictionaries, but I won't go there.) Since these two types are so fundamental I'd argue they are both worthy of inclusion. -- -Mike Schinkel http://www.mikeschinkel.com/blogs/ http://www.welldesignedurls.org http://atlanta-web.orgReceived on Tuesday, 16 October 2007 05:54:10 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Sunday, 10 October 2021 22:17:50 UTC