RE: URI Templates - optional variables?

Joe Gregorio wrote:
> The 'listjoin' operator, <&>, is the part of my proposal that 
> I feel the least comfortable with, as it ends up introducing 'types'
> into the grammar. 

I would argue that _everything_ can be represented by two types: strings and
lists of string; Everything else can be represented either in a string or a
list of strings (with the possible exception of dictionaries, but I won't go
there.)  Since these two types are so fundamental I'd argue they are both
worthy of inclusion.

-Mike Schinkel 

Received on Tuesday, 16 October 2007 05:54:10 UTC