Re: RFC 2822 email addresses in tag URIs

Larry Masinter wrote:

> "Author's 48 hours" isn't really the right time to re-raise
> this issue.

Oops, of course, I thought that this discussion was about a
new I-D.  BTW, can I now submit the RfC 3986 appendix D.2
problems as erratum ?

See also <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.org.w3c.uri/613>.

It's all related, I need the opposite of the former <uric>,
because that's the subset of characters where %-encoding is
required for any URI scheme, and Message-IDs in news are in
the same vein as tags or UUIDs.

                         Bye, Frank

Received on Friday, 14 October 2005 14:16:22 UTC