RE: Apple does it again - pcast

Sorry, I was referring to the new process document, now in IETF
last call. It proposes, for provisional registration

      Contact information identifying the person supplying the
      registration is included.  Previously unregistered URI schemes
      discovered in use may be registered by third parties on behalf of
      those who created the URI scheme; in this case, both the
      registering party and the scheme creator SHOULD be identified.

and later

   Provisional registrations may be updated by the original registrant
   or anyone designated by them.  In addition, the IESG may reassign
   responsibility for a provisional registration scheme.

so you could register the new Apple schemes yourself, but then
allow someone from Apple to update them.


-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-announce-bounces@ietf.org On Behalf Of The IESG
Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2005 3:33 PM
To: IETF-Announce
Subject: Last Call: 'Guidelines and Registration Procedures for new URI
Schemes' to BCP 

The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider the

following document:

- 'Guidelines and Registration Procedures for new URI Schemes '
   <draft-hansen-2717bis-2718bis-uri-guidelines-05.txt> as a BCP

The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action.  Please send any comments to the
iesg@ietf.org or ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2005-08-09.

The file can be obtained via
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-hansen-2717bis-2718bis-uri-guideli
nes-05.txt

Received on Sunday, 17 July 2005 20:00:10 UTC