Following an offline exchange, I offer the following wording as a possible way to express the desire for uniqueness of names while keeping open the option of documenting duplicates: [[ New submissions for the provisional registry MUST NOT use a scheme name that is already present in the permanent registry, and SHOULD NOT use a name that is already present in the provisional registry. ]] I believe this approach is consistent with what were aiming to achieve with the message jheader field registry. I haven't figured exactly where it might fit in the proposed registration draft. #g ------------ Graham Klyne For email: http://www.ninebynine.org/#ContactReceived on Sunday, 30 January 2005 12:09:39 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Sunday, 10 October 2021 22:17:46 UTC