At 17:55 25/01/05 +0000, Charles Lindsey wrote: >I am not so sure that the header registration scheme _does_ permit >duplicates of any sort (except perhaps where both versions have the same >intent and there is disagreement as to the exact syntax). If you're referring to the message header field provisional registry, here's the text: [[ 4.2.2. Provisional Message Header Field Submission Template Registration as a Provisional Message Header Field does not imply any kind of endorsement by the IETF, IANA or any other body. The main requirements for a header field to be included in the provisional repository are that it MUST have a citable specification, and there MUST NOT be a corresponding entry (with same field name and protocol) in the permanent header field registry. ]] -- http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3864.txt #g ------------ Graham Klyne For email: http://www.ninebynine.org/#ContactReceived on Wednesday, 26 January 2005 17:29:33 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Sunday, 10 October 2021 22:17:46 UTC