- From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
- Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 17:26:47 +0000
- To: "Charles Lindsey" <chl@clerew.man.ac.uk>, uri@w3.org
At 17:55 25/01/05 +0000, Charles Lindsey wrote:
>I am not so sure that the header registration scheme _does_ permit
>duplicates of any sort (except perhaps where both versions have the same
>intent and there is disagreement as to the exact syntax).
If you're referring to the message header field provisional registry,
here's the text:
[[
4.2.2. Provisional Message Header Field Submission Template
Registration as a Provisional Message Header Field does not imply any
kind of endorsement by the IETF, IANA or any other body.
The main requirements for a header field to be included in the
provisional repository are that it MUST have a citable specification,
and there MUST NOT be a corresponding entry (with same field name and
protocol) in the permanent header field registry.
]]
-- http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3864.txt
#g
------------
Graham Klyne
For email:
http://www.ninebynine.org/#Contact
Received on Wednesday, 26 January 2005 17:29:33 UTC