W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > uri@w3.org > January 2005

RE: Duplication of provisional URI namespace tokens in 2717/8-bis

From: Hammond, Tony <T.Hammond@nature.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 10:04:56 -0000
Message-ID: <125F7834E11A5741A7D79412EE3504F90F26CE80@UK1APPS2.nature.com>
To: 'Larry Masinter' <LMM@acm.org>, "'Weibel,Stu'" <weibel@oclc.org>, uri@w3.org

Hi Larry:

> The proposed registration rules are based on the fact that
> it is possible to invent and deploy a URI scheme without
> IANA and IESG approval.
But this does beg the question of what exactly _is_ the point of
registration. Of course, duplicates can exist out in unregistered land but
what is the motivator then to enter new schemes into a registry if there is
no guarantee of uniqueness? How would an implementor disambiguate one sheme
from an identically-named scheme?



DISCLAIMER: This e-mail is confidential and should not be used by anyone who is not the original intended recipient. If you have received this e-mail in error please inform the sender and delete it from your mailbox or any other storage mechanism. Neither Macmillan Publishers Limited nor any of its agents accept liability for any statements made which are clearly the sender's own and not expressly made on behalf of Macmillan Publishers Limited or one of its agents. Please note that neither Macmillan Publishers Limited nor any of its agents accept any responsibility for viruses that may be contained in this e-mail or its attachments and it is your responsibility to scan the e-mail and attachments (if any). No contracts may be concluded on behalf of Macmillan Publishers Limited or its agents by means of e-mail communication. Macmillan Publishers Limited Registered in England and Wales with registered number 785998 Registered Office Brunel Road, Houndmills, Basingstoke RG21 6XS
Received on Wednesday, 12 January 2005 10:05:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Sunday, 10 October 2021 22:17:46 UTC