On Mon, 2005-02-14 at 13:04 -0500, Weibel,Stu wrote: [...] > Larry Masinter raises a legitimate concern about land-grab speculation > of URI scheme names. This concern deserves attention, but must be > divorced from the functional requirement of unique scheme tokens in the > URI space. ??? They're intimately connected. I don't think it's possible nor advisable, let alone mandatory, to separate them. The land-grab phenomenon results from scarcity. Uniqueness creates the scarcity. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29EReceived on Monday, 14 February 2005 18:33:08 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Sunday, 10 October 2021 22:17:47 UTC