W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > uri@w3.org > February 2005

RE: Duplication of provisional URI namespace tokens in 2717/8-bis

From: Weibel,Stu <weibel@oclc.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 13:47:32 -0500
Message-ID: <8CC50D49B6828C4FBAB7DA1FCAB0526A27147A@OAEXCH1SERVER.oa.oclc.org>
To: "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>
Cc: <uri@w3.org>

They clearly are related, but they are different requirements and
distinct mechanisms for coping with them can be elaborated.

As currently written, 2717/18 needlessly sacrifices one requirement to
guard against danger to the other.

stu 

-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Connolly [mailto:connolly@w3.org] 
Sent: Monday, February 14, 2005 1:33 PM
To: Weibel,Stu
Cc: uri@w3.org
Subject: RE: Duplication of provisional URI namespace tokens in
2717/8-bis

On Mon, 2005-02-14 at 13:04 -0500, Weibel,Stu wrote:
[...]
> Larry Masinter raises a legitimate concern about land-grab speculation

> of URI scheme names.  This concern deserves attention, but must be 
> divorced from the functional requirement of unique scheme tokens in 
> the URI space.

???

They're intimately connected. I don't think it's possible nor advisable,
let alone mandatory, to separate them.

The land-grab phenomenon results from scarcity.
Uniqueness creates the scarcity.

--
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 14 February 2005 18:48:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:25:09 UTC