Re: Summary, URIREV04 BOF, 8/6/2004 9-11:30am

I think we can agree that we don't want any duplications in the 
standards track list of schemes.

	Tony Hansen
	tony+uri@maillennium.att.com

Paul Hoffman / IMC wrote:
> 
> At 8:05 PM -0700 8/8/04, Larry Masinter wrote:
> 
>> * Revising RFC 2717 and 2718
>>   Tony Hansen and Ted Hardie will create a new document which
>>   replaces these, but with the idea that non-standards-track
>>   scheme registration will be much easier, with the main purpose
>>   to avoid duplicates.
> 
> There was a fair amount of disagreement about that last clause. A few of 
> us (at least Leslie Daigle and I) thought that allowing duplicates but 
> documenting the registrants of each would cause less problems for the 
> registry, and still allow legit developers to pick a good new name, than 
> trying to come up with a single-entry system.

Received on Monday, 9 August 2004 03:56:18 UTC