- From: Larry Masinter <LMM@acm.org>
- Date: Sun, 08 Aug 2004 20:57:05 -0700
- To: "'Paul Hoffman / IMC'" <phoffman@imc.org>
- Cc: uri@w3.org, "'Ted Hardie'" <hardie@qualcomm.com>, "'Scott Hollenbeck'" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
Details are in the minutes, which I just sent out. It was pointed out that a registry that allows duplicates can still help avoid them, at least if those participating have any sense. Please, if you're going to discuss topics mentioned in the minutes, please start a new subject line. Larry > > Tony Hansen and Ted Hardie will create a new document which > > replaces these, but with the idea that non-standards-track > > scheme registration will be much easier, with the main purpose > > to avoid duplicates. > > There was a fair amount of disagreement about that last clause. A few > of us (at least Leslie Daigle and I) thought that allowing duplicates > but documenting the registrants of each would cause less problems for > the registry, and still allow legit developers to pick a good new > name, than trying to come up with a single-entry system.
Received on Monday, 9 August 2004 03:58:14 UTC