W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > uri@w3.org > April 2004

Re: test cases and implementation reports

From: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 18:06:55 +0900
Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.J.20040420175821.074e1500@localhost>
To: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>, uri@w3.org
Cc: olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org>, Hugo Haas <hugo@w3.org>

At 16:23 04/04/20 +0900, Martin Duerst wrote:

>I have created a testing page at http://www.w3.org/2004/04/uri-rel-test.html
>to make (manual) testing of the implementations in various browsers easy.

Here is another test result, using the link checker at
http://validator.w3.org/checklink on the above page and
using the output (of course mostly invalid links) to check
the linkchecker's internal behavior. This is perl, and
probably uses some perl library.

All tests are passed except for the following:

#       relative        absolute                Link checker

6       //g             http://g                http://g/  (added slash)
7       ?y              http://a/b/c/d;p?y      http://a/b/c/?y  (missing d;p)
31      ../../../g      http://a/g              http://a/../g    (leftover ../)
32      ../../../../g   http://a/g              http://a/../../g (leftover 
./../)
41      /./g            http://a/g              http://a/./g     (leftover ./)
51      ./../g          http://a/b/g            http://a/b/c/g   (leftover c/)

For test 71, the link checker uses strict parsing.

Regards,     Martin.
Received on Tuesday, 20 April 2004 05:14:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:25:07 UTC