- From: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 16:23:14 +0900
- To: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>, uri@w3.org
- Cc: Jose Kahan <jose.kahan@w3.org>, Laurent Carcone <Laurent.Carcone@inrialpes.fr>
I have created a testing page at http://www.w3.org/2004/04/uri-rel-test.html to make (manual) testing of the implementations in various browsers easy. I have used this page to test Amaya (my version, compiled from CVS checkout on 2004-01-04). I don't know whether (or to what extent) processing is done by Amaya or by libwww. Here are the results: All tests are passed, except the following: # rel correct Amaya 6 //g http://g http://g/ (additional slash) 7 ?y http://a/b/c/d;p?y http://a/b/c/?y (d;p removed) 9 #s http://a/b/c/d;p?q#s {testpage URI}#s 15 http://a/b/c/d;p?q not testable (cursor cannot be placed in empty field) 43 g. http://a/b/c/g. http://a/b/c/g (dot removed) 51 ./../g http://a/b/g http://a/b/c/g (/c not removed) 55 g;x=1/./y http://a/b/c/g;x=1/y http://a/b/c/g;x=1/./y (precedence of ; over /) 56 g;x=1/../y http://a/b/c/y http://a/b/c/g;x=1/../y (precedence of ; over /) For test 71, Amaya uses strict parsing. Hope this helps. Regards, Martin. At 18:57 04/04/19 -0700, Roy T. Fielding wrote: >I have begun updating the test cases and adding reports to > > http://gbiv.com/protocols/uri/test/ > >If you have a URI syntax implementation (client, server, >whatever), please test it for consistency with the given >test cases (and any other tests that you wish to come up with >based on draft 05) and send the results to this list. > >Cheers, > >Roy T. Fielding <http://roy.gbiv.com/> >Chief Scientist, Day Software <http://www.day.com/>
Received on Tuesday, 20 April 2004 03:33:26 UTC