- From: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 16:23:14 +0900
- To: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>, uri@w3.org
- Cc: Jose Kahan <jose.kahan@w3.org>, Laurent Carcone <Laurent.Carcone@inrialpes.fr>
I have created a testing page at http://www.w3.org/2004/04/uri-rel-test.html
to make (manual) testing of the implementations in various browsers easy.
I have used this page to test Amaya (my version, compiled from CVS
checkout on 2004-01-04). I don't know whether (or to what extent)
processing is done by Amaya or by libwww. Here are the results:
All tests are passed, except the following:
# rel correct Amaya
6 //g http://g http://g/ (additional slash)
7 ?y http://a/b/c/d;p?y http://a/b/c/?y (d;p removed)
9 #s http://a/b/c/d;p?q#s {testpage URI}#s
15 http://a/b/c/d;p?q not testable
(cursor cannot be placed
in empty field)
43 g. http://a/b/c/g. http://a/b/c/g (dot removed)
51 ./../g http://a/b/g http://a/b/c/g (/c not removed)
55 g;x=1/./y http://a/b/c/g;x=1/y http://a/b/c/g;x=1/./y
(precedence of ;
over /)
56 g;x=1/../y http://a/b/c/y http://a/b/c/g;x=1/../y
(precedence of ;
over /)
For test 71, Amaya uses strict parsing.
Hope this helps.
Regards, Martin.
At 18:57 04/04/19 -0700, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
>I have begun updating the test cases and adding reports to
>
> http://gbiv.com/protocols/uri/test/
>
>If you have a URI syntax implementation (client, server,
>whatever), please test it for consistency with the given
>test cases (and any other tests that you wish to come up with
>based on draft 05) and send the results to this list.
>
>Cheers,
>
>Roy T. Fielding <http://roy.gbiv.com/>
>Chief Scientist, Day Software <http://www.day.com/>
Received on Tuesday, 20 April 2004 03:33:26 UTC