- From: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 17:39:11 -0400
- To: "Larry Masinter" <LMM@acm.org>, "'Al Gilman'" <asgilman@iamdigex.net>, <Silvia.Pfeiffer@csiro.au>
- Cc: <Silvia.Pfeiffer@csiro.au>, <uri@w3.org>, <Conrad.Parker@csiro.au>
At 09:10 03/06/25 -0700, Larry Masinter wrote: >I think I now understand that most of this proposal is >dependent on updating HTTP (RFC 2396) and RTSP (RFC 2326) >to allow fragment identifiers in the request URI. > >I can see that they've managed to produce a demonstration >where doing so "works" with a HTTP server, but I don't >think it's a good idea. > >No matter what the syntax of the fragment identifier. I agree with Larry. Regards, Martin.
Received on Wednesday, 25 June 2003 17:54:54 UTC