- From: Larry Masinter <LMM@acm.org>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 09:10:07 -0700
- To: "'Al Gilman'" <asgilman@iamdigex.net>, "'Martin Duerst'" <duerst@w3.org>, <Silvia.Pfeiffer@csiro.au>
- Cc: <Silvia.Pfeiffer@csiro.au>, <uri@w3.org>, <Conrad.Parker@csiro.au>
I think I now understand that most of this proposal is dependent on updating HTTP (RFC 2396) and RTSP (RFC 2326) to allow fragment identifiers in the request URI. I can see that they've managed to produce a demonstration where doing so "works" with a HTTP server, but I don't think it's a good idea. No matter what the syntax of the fragment identifier. Larry
Received on Wednesday, 25 June 2003 12:12:09 UTC