- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 15:59:29 -0400
- To: Paul Grosso <pgrosso@arbortext.com>
- Cc: uri@w3.org
Paul Grosso scripsit: > >No, that won't happen under RFC 2396 bis; it is required to use the > >existing document if the base URI matches the document URI. > > I don't understand. Whose base URI? Sorry, I meant to write that if the non-fragment part of the URI matches the base URI, then the current document is not re-fetched. So in the document "http://example.com/foo.html", the URIs "http://example.com/foo.html#bar" and "#bar" both refer to the referent of "bar" in the current document. > In my case, I've used xml:base to set the base URI to another > document, so it doesn't match the document URI. Ah, I understand the use case now. Yes, then the change will impact you. -- Income tax, if I may be pardoned for saying so, John Cowan is a tax on income. --Lord Macnaghten (1901) jcowan@reutershealth.com
Received on Wednesday, 25 June 2003 16:00:05 UTC