W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > uri@w3.org > April 2001

Re: Proposal: 'tag' URIs

From: Sean B. Palmer <sean@mysterylights.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 17:40:56 +0100
Message-ID: <02e701c0cf39$16dde420$16ec93c3@z5n9x1>
To: <uri@w3.org>, "Tim Kindberg" <timothy@hpl.hp.com>
Cc: <sandro@w3.org>
> > If you didn't own it on /1, then you can't use it.
> The intention is that an entity can mint tags on a date d when
> it was unassigned, if it became the assignee of the authority
> name _immediately_  after the continuous period of [...]

How would you qualify "_immediately_" in this case? What period of
time? For example, there might be objections to this from a person who
controlled a certain date space from 1 to 2-1-5 only to find that
someone who registers the same domain name on 20-2 starts using 2-1-6
as a namespace :-)

Kindest Regards,
Sean B. Palmer
@prefix : <http://webns.net/roughterms/> .
:Sean :hasHomepage <http://purl.org/net/sbp/> .
Received on Friday, 27 April 2001 12:43:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:25:02 UTC