W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > uri@w3.org > April 2001

Re: Proposal: 'tag' URIs

From: Tim Kindberg <timothy@hpl.hp.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 09:41:51 -0700
Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.1.20010427093842.02b72948@hplex1.hpl.hp.com>
To: uri@w3.org
At 10:50 AM 4/27/2001 -0400, Michael Mealling wrote:
>And that's why we have URNs. Its a framework within which you can
>define your own namespace but which defines a more specific set of
>semantics (persistence, location independence, etc) than URIs in the general
>case.

Location independence is the wrong assumption for my applications: we 
require contextual resolution (the opposite).

And yet you said:
At 11:32 AM 4/27/2001 -0400, Michael Mealling wrote:
> > Tags are specifically intended to be 'agnostic' with respect to any
> > particular resolution scheme. It's not that they will not get resolved (in
> > CoolTown, resolution, usually to URLs, is precisely what we do with them)
> > -- but we want all resolvers to be equal, and for the choice of 
> resolver to
> > be made in context, not mandated as a simple function of the given URI.
>
>URNs made that exact same determination many years ago....

So I'm confused!

Thanks,

Tim.


Tim Kindberg

internet & mobile systems lab  hewlett-packard laboratories
1501 page mill road, ms 1u-17
palo alto
ca 94304-1126
usa

www.champignon.net/TimKindberg/
timothy@hpl.hp.com
voice +1 650 857 5609
fax +1 650 857 2358
Received on Friday, 27 April 2001 12:42:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:25:02 UTC