W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > uri@w3.org > April 2000

tv:

From: Jerding, Dean <Dean.Jerding@sciatl.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2000 11:33:49 +0900
Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.J.20000420113341.035b7780@sh.w3.mag.keio.ac.jp>
To: uri@w3.org

Where is the latest specification for the "tv:" scheme?  I'm new to this 
list, so apologize if this is documented elsewhere.  What I have seen on w3 
was just a draft of a proposal with some unfinished areas such as tying in 
to ATSC, DVB, etc SI specifications.  Scientific-Atlanta is using our own 
version of a "tv:" like URL scheme so we'd like to contribute to the 
specification and abide by the standard.

thanks
Dean

Dean Jerding, Ph.D.
Applications Software | Subscriber Networks | Scientific-Atlanta, Inc.
Dean.Jerding@sciatl.com | 770 236 3388 | 770 236 2449 (fax)

-----Original Message-----
From: Philipp Hoschka [<mailto:ph@w3.org>mailto:ph<mailto:ph@w3.org>@w3.org]
Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2000 12:07 AM
To: Dan Zigmond
Cc: 'Larry Masinter'; uri@w3.org; www-tv@w3.org
Subject: Submit TV-URI work to IESG ? (was: Re: "lid" URLs)


Dan,

i think that at least the "tv:" scheme seems to be ready to be
forwarded to the IESG for adoption - what do you think ? There
was not much discussion last time you did an update, so maybe it's
time to wrap this up.

-Philipp

Dan Zigmond a 馗rit :
 >
 > Agreed.  We were a little careless in our terminology (as others also
 > pointed out), and I just haven't gotten around to revising the drafts.
 >
 >         Dan
 >
 > ---------------------------------------------------
 > Dan Zigmond
 > Senior Group Manager, Client Technologies
 > WebTV Networks, Inc.
 > djz@corp.webtv.net
 > ---------------------------------------------------
 >
 > -----Original Message-----
 > From: Larry Masinter [<mailto:LM@att.com>mailto:LM@att.com]
 > Sent: Saturday, April 15, 2000 10:33 AM
 > To: uri@w3.org; www-tv@w3.org
 > Subject: "lid" URLs
 >
 > (someone) wrote me:
 >
 > > I've just noticed a couple of Internet drafts that propose and refer to a
 > > URI scheme called lid:
 > >
 > >    draft-blackketter-lid-00.txt
 > >    draft-finseth-isanlid-00.txt
 > >
 > > I have two thoughts:
 > >
 > > (a) these lid:'s look more like URNs to me
 > >
 > > (b) the lid draft claims that lid:'s are simulatneously URIs and URNs, but
 > > they don't conform to URN syntax (in not having a leading "urn:" or
 > > namespace identifier parts).
 >
 > I don't have a problem with URL-schemes that have URN-like semantics,
 > since there are enough of them already (cid, news, etc.). I think the
 > wording (saying that lid URLs are URNs) probably needs to change, since
 > it just adds confusion.
 >
 > Larry
Received on Wednesday, 19 April 2000 22:30:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:25:01 UTC