W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > uri@w3.org > April 2000

Re: tv:

From: by way of <ph@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2000 11:33:13 +0900
Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.J.20000420113305.035b8120@sh.w3.mag.keio.ac.jp>
To: uri@w3.org
Dean,

See
"Uniform Resource Identifiers for Television Broadcasts"

http://search.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-zigmond-tv-url-04.txt


 > "Jerding, Dean" a 馗rit :
 >
 > Where is the latest specification for the "tv:" scheme?  I'm new to
 > this list, so apologize if this is documented elsewhere.  What I have
 > seen on w3 was just a draft of a proposal with some unfinished areas
 > such as tying in to ATSC, DVB, etc SI specifications.
 > Scientific-Atlanta is using our own version of a "tv:" like URL scheme
 > so we'd like to contribute to the specification and abide by the
 > standard.
 >
 > thanks
 > Dean
 >
 > Dean Jerding, Ph.D.
 > Applications Software | Subscriber Networks | Scientific-Atlanta, Inc.
 > Dean.Jerding@sciatl.com | 770 236 3388 | 770 236 2449 (fax)
 >
 > -----Original Message-----
 > From: Philipp Hoschka [mailto:ph@w3.org]
 > Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2000 12:07 AM
 > To: Dan Zigmond
 > Cc: 'Larry Masinter'; uri@w3.org; www-tv@w3.org
 > Subject: Submit TV-URI work to IESG ? (was: Re: "lid" URLs)
 >
 > Dan,
 >
 > i think that at least the "tv:" scheme seems to be ready to be
 > forwarded to the IESG for adoption - what do you think ? There
 > was not much discussion last time you did an update, so maybe it's
 > time to wrap this up.
 >
 > -Philipp
 >
 > Dan Zigmond a 馗rit :
 > >
 > > Agreed.  We were a little careless in our terminology (as others
 > also
 > > pointed out), and I just haven't gotten around to revising the
 > drafts.
 > >
 > >         Dan
 > >
 > > ---------------------------------------------------
 > > Dan Zigmond
 > > Senior Group Manager, Client Technologies
 > > WebTV Networks, Inc.
 > > djz@corp.webtv.net
 > > ---------------------------------------------------
 > >
 > > -----Original Message-----
 > > From: Larry Masinter [mailto:LM@att.com]
 > > Sent: Saturday, April 15, 2000 10:33 AM
 > > To: uri@w3.org; www-tv@w3.org
 > > Subject: "lid" URLs
 > >
 > > (someone) wrote me:
 > >
 > > > I've just noticed a couple of Internet drafts that propose and
 > refer to a
 > > > URI scheme called lid:
 > > >
 > > >    draft-blackketter-lid-00.txt
 > > >    draft-finseth-isanlid-00.txt
 > > >
 > > > I have two thoughts:
 > > >
 > > > (a) these lid:'s look more like URNs to me
 > > >
 > > > (b) the lid draft claims that lid:'s are simulatneously URIs and
 > URNs, but
 > > > they don't conform to URN syntax (in not having a leading "urn:"
 > or
 > > > namespace identifier parts).
 > >
 > > I don't have a problem with URL-schemes that have URN-like
 > semantics,
 > > since there are enough of them already (cid, news, etc.). I think
 > the
 > > wording (saying that lid URLs are URNs) probably needs to change,
 > since
 > > it just adds confusion.
 > >
 > > Larry
Received on Wednesday, 19 April 2000 22:30:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:25:01 UTC