- From: Rich Petke <R.PETKE@csi.compuserve.com>
- Date: 13 Feb 97 10:53:56 EST
- To: URI <uri@bunyip.com>
Last month I announced the availability of a list (ietf-url@imc.org) for the discussion of the PROCESS related to the development of new new URL schemes. The idea was to keep these discussions (and any WG that forms out of these discussions) separate from the issues related to advancing the existing URL RFCs to draft status. To date only 28 people have subscribed to ietf-url@imc.org. Larry Masinter started the ball rolling by publishing an I-D for a proposed process BUT there has been very little discussion on the draft or on the topic as a whole. The key question that has to be asked is: Is there still interest in the URI community for developing this process document? If yes, we need to move forward with a charter. If not, we can always find something else to do with our time and not have to worry about scheduling in Memphis. Rich Petke (r.petke@csi.compuserve.com)
Received on Thursday, 13 February 1997 10:55:30 UTC