- From: Keld J|rn Simonsen <keld@dkuug.dk>
- Date: Wed, 31 Jan 1996 16:42:33 +0100
- To: Glenn Adams <glenn@stonehand.com>
- Cc: Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com>, yergeau@alis.ca, Dan.Oscarsson@malmo.trab.se, html-wg@fssun09.dev.oclc.org, http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com, maits@dkuug.dk, uri@bunyip.com
Glenn Adams writes: > > From: keld@dkuug.dk (Keld J|rn Simonsen) > Date: Tue, 30 Jan 1996 23:14:43 +0100 > > ... for example big-5 is not covered by ISO 10646 ... > > Why do you say this? I have a mapping table from BIG5 to 10646. > BIG5 was one of the source sets used by the original CJK-JRG in > developing the Unified CJK Repertoire 1.0 which went into Unicode 1.0 > and then into 10646. > > Perhaps you are confusing BIG5 with the new version of CNS 11643, > which, indeed, is not fully covered by 10646 (although the previous > 1986 version of CNS 11643 was covered). I may have been confusing it with CNS 11643. There is one of the big character sets that covers something like 90.000 characters, this was the one I meant. Sorry for the confusion. The problem still exist that not all characters of the world is in ISO 10646. Keld
Received on Wednesday, 31 January 1996 10:49:09 UTC