Re: date in URN

>>>>> On Fri, 23 Jun 1995 08:06:44 -0700, said:
> Larry Masinter wrote:
> |
> |>The more I think about it, the more convinced I am that if URNs are to be as
> |>persistent as possible, that they should be numeric (or alphanumeric codes
> |>like the LoC numbers or British/Canadian postal code system).  If you use
> |>human-readable names like "proper" or "ibm" people will get emotional and/or
> |>possessive about them, making it much harder to prevent the URNs containing
> |>them from changing over time.

but actually, I didn't write that, even though I think there is a
serious issue of longevity of undated human-readable names.

Received on Friday, 23 June 1995 11:12:10 UTC