Re[2]: yet another revision of the charter

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Mark Madsen: "Critical Comparison of URN Proposals"
• Previous message: weibel@oclc.org: "The Unofficial, Non-IETF Sanctioned Metadata BOF"

Date: Fri, 14 Jul 1995 02:21:34 +1000
From: Murray Bent <murrayb@icis.qut.edu.au>
Message-Id: <199507131621.CAA27879@wittgenstein.icis.qut.edu.au>
To: uri@bunyip.com
Subject: Re[2]: yet another revision of the charter


>> and what exactly would a generic URN resolution procedure be?

>A generic resolution procedure might talk about what to try first,
>what to use as a fallback, how errors should be reported, how
>access controls might work, etc.


Touch wood and hope that various name resolution procedures can be
composed together to resolve composite names [XFN].

[XFN]  X/open Federated Naming 

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Mark Madsen: "Critical Comparison of URN Proposals"
• Previous message: weibel@oclc.org: "The Unofficial, Non-IETF Sanctioned Metadata BOF"