Re: Whither URI: Revising the charter, disband URI?

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Mark Madsen: "Re: URN Resolution Paths Considered Harmful"
• Previous message: Larry Masinter: "revised agenda for Stockholm IETF"

From: Rich Salz <rsalz@osf.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 1995 01:43:22 -0400
Message-Id: <9507110543.AA03514@sulphur.osf.org>
To: msm@ansa.co.uk, owner-uri@bunyip.com, rdaniel@acl.lanl.gov
Subject: Re: Whither URI: Revising the charter, disband URI?
Cc: masinter@parc.xerox.com, uri@bunyip.com

>Yes, there is a good case for a general object architecture. That's what

I believe IETF-based attempts to define an object architecture are
likely to run right into the bet-the-company efforts being done
by IBM (SOM), HP (Corba), Sun (corba), Microsoft (COM/OLE), Digital
(ObjectBroker?), etc.

I'd try to avoid objects if at all possible.
	/r$

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Mark Madsen: "Re: URN Resolution Paths Considered Harmful"
• Previous message: Larry Masinter: "revised agenda for Stockholm IETF"