Re: ClearSpec: representing implementation in W3C technical reports

> On 12 Mar 2022, at 5:09 am, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net> wrote:
> 
> Many/most RDF test suites use the Evaluation and Report Language (EARL) format [1] for reporting implementation conformance, which gets rolled up into a report such as that used for Turtle [2]. Not suprising that we like our test reporting to be queryable, and can use that to generate a useful HTML representation. It would be great if that presentation could look like caniuse.

This is roughly where we ended up with caniuse:
https://github.com/w3c/respec/pull/4080

Still needs quite a bit of work, particularly on mobile and some a11y aspects (any volunteers out there want to help?). 

However, it could serve as a basis to build on. Notable questions:

 * do things need to be grouped? 
 * are there software icons that need to be shown? If yes, where are those hosted and kept up to date?

As mentioned in the previous email, it might be good to spin up a new issue at:
https://github.com/speced/speced-cg/issues/

To discuss further. 

Kind regards,
Marcos 

Received on Tuesday, 15 March 2022 00:06:38 UTC