W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > spec-prod@w3.org > April to June 2013

Re: Please don't shout or throw things at this respec newbie

From: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2013 23:41:39 +0200
To: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>
Cc: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>, "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>, spec-prod@frink.w3.org
Message-ID: <20130603234139790580.34269fb8@xn--mlform-iua.no>
Robin Berjon, Mon, 03 Jun 2013 22:58:04 +0200:
> On 03/06/2013 22:40 , Leif Halvard Silli wrote:
>> Robin Berjon, Mon, 03 Jun 2013 22:17:26 +0200:
>>> On 03/06/2013 19:29 , Leif Halvard Silli wrote:
>>>> I have filed a bug for this, 3 moths ago:
>>>> https://github.com/darobin/respec/issues/157


>> Hm - I think that it is the same bug *except* that I did not understand
>> what I was reporting … (I did not locate the bug.) And so I ended up
>> reporting something else. :-D
> 
> Heh :) In the bug you mention "INVALID_STATE_ERR: DOM Exception 11", 
> which is a different type of error — so I thought it must be 
> something else.

Seems you could be right. Must check. But I had the same newbie bad 
experience as he had. :-)

  ...
> That said I noted that both the RequireJS and the jQuery that were 
> used were pretty old, so I've updated them. But I need to test more 
> before releasing.

Good.

> If your problem came from error code 12 too, then the fix I made for 
> Henry is likely to fix for you too. That said, same warning: use 
> XHTML at your own risk, it's not something any of the ReSpec 
> developers ever use (in recent history at least), and it's not tested 
> for.

Apart from ’author using a non-polyglot file’, I see 2 risks:
  * script that reference non-wellformed, non-polyglot templates
  * document.write somewhere in the code
-- 
leif halvard silli
Received on Monday, 3 June 2013 21:45:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:55:18 UTC