W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > spec-prod@w3.org > April to June 2013

Re: Respec bugs

From: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
Date: Tue, 7 May 2013 13:15:05 +0100
To: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
Cc: "spec-prod@w3.org" <spec-prod@w3.org>
Message-ID: <F8F6416A896045889D03EB3E1733CC81@marcosc.com>
Hi Richard, 

On Tuesday, May 7, 2013 at 1:05 PM, Richard Ishida wrote:

> Annoyingly I have to keep fixing a couple of bugs while trying to 
> publish a FPWD of a document intended to become a WG NOTE. Where should 
> I report them?

Here:
https://github.com/darobin/respec/issues

> 
> I'll report here for the time being. Spec status was set to FPWD-NOTE.
> 
> [1] Status boilerplate:
> 
> "This document was published by the Internationalization Working Group 
> as a First Public Working Group Note"
> 
> is ambiguous. I think respec should generate:
> 
> "This document was published by the Internationalization Working Group 
> as a First Public Working Draft. The group intends to publish this 
> document as a Working Group Note"
> 
> 
> [2] Pubrules gives the following error:
> 
> "Error. The W3C style sheet should be 
> http://www.w3.org/StyleSheets/TR/W3C-WG-NOTE. It is currently 
> //www.w3.org/StyleSheets/TR/W3C-WG-NOTE (http://www.w3.org/StyleSheets/TR/W3C-WG-NOTE). "
> 
The above is a bug with pub rules, so you will need to ask the maintainer of pub rules about that one.  "//www.w3.org/StyleSheets/TR/W3C-WG-NOTE" is a perfectly valid URI (the validator should just prepend "http" to it). 
Received on Tuesday, 7 May 2013 12:15:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:55:18 UTC