- From: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
- Date: Tue, 7 May 2013 13:15:05 +0100
- To: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
- Cc: "spec-prod@w3.org" <spec-prod@w3.org>
Hi Richard, On Tuesday, May 7, 2013 at 1:05 PM, Richard Ishida wrote: > Annoyingly I have to keep fixing a couple of bugs while trying to > publish a FPWD of a document intended to become a WG NOTE. Where should > I report them? Here: https://github.com/darobin/respec/issues > > I'll report here for the time being. Spec status was set to FPWD-NOTE. > > [1] Status boilerplate: > > "This document was published by the Internationalization Working Group > as a First Public Working Group Note" > > is ambiguous. I think respec should generate: > > "This document was published by the Internationalization Working Group > as a First Public Working Draft. The group intends to publish this > document as a Working Group Note" > > > [2] Pubrules gives the following error: > > "Error. The W3C style sheet should be > http://www.w3.org/StyleSheets/TR/W3C-WG-NOTE. It is currently > //www.w3.org/StyleSheets/TR/W3C-WG-NOTE (http://www.w3.org/StyleSheets/TR/W3C-WG-NOTE). " > The above is a bug with pub rules, so you will need to ask the maintainer of pub rules about that one. "//www.w3.org/StyleSheets/TR/W3C-WG-NOTE" is a perfectly valid URI (the validator should just prepend "http" to it).
Received on Tuesday, 7 May 2013 12:15:37 UTC