- From: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 07 May 2013 15:44:58 +0100
- To: spec-prod@w3.org
These two issues are also solved by selecting FPWD rather than FPWD-NOTE, and setting noRecTrack to true. I added a sentence to the user-supplied para in the SOTD to say "The Working Group expects this document to become a Working Group Note.", since otherwise respec doesn't add anything. So the moral of the story seems to be to do the three things above if you want to publish a FPWD of a document intended to be a WG NOTE. RI On 07/05/2013 13:05, Richard Ishida wrote: > Annoyingly I have to keep fixing a couple of bugs while trying to > publish a FPWD of a document intended to become a WG NOTE. Where should > I report them? > > I'll report here for the time being. Spec status was set to FPWD-NOTE. > > [1] Status boilerplate: > > "This document was published by the Internationalization Working Group > as a First Public Working Group Note" > > is ambiguous. I think respec should generate: > > "This document was published by the Internationalization Working Group > as a First Public Working Draft. The group intends to publish this > document as a Working Group Note" > > > [2] Pubrules gives the following error: > > "Error. The W3C style sheet should be > http://www.w3.org/StyleSheets/TR/W3C-WG-NOTE. It is currently > //www.w3.org/StyleSheets/TR/W3C-WG-NOTE. " > > > RI > > -- Richard Ishida, W3C http://rishida.net/
Received on Tuesday, 7 May 2013 14:45:26 UTC