W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > spec-prod@w3.org > April to June 2013

Re: Respec bugs

From: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 07 May 2013 14:41:55 +0100
Message-ID: <518904A3.9050805@w3.org>
To: spec-prod@w3.org
[sending here for the sake of completeness]

[4] the This Version link that is generated is
http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/NOTE-klreq-20130514/

it should be
http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-klreq-20130514/

since this is just a FPWD.

RI


On 07/05/2013 13:14, Richard Ishida wrote:
> [3] It produces a "Previous version:" subhead, though no pointer. This
> shouldn't be there for a FPWD.
>
> RI
>
>
> On 07/05/2013 13:05, Richard Ishida wrote:
>> Annoyingly I have to keep fixing a couple of bugs while trying to
>> publish a FPWD of a document intended to become a WG NOTE. Where should
>> I report them?
>>
>> I'll report here for the time being.  Spec status was set to FPWD-NOTE.
>>
>> [1] Status boilerplate:
>>
>> "This document was published by the Internationalization Working Group
>> as a First Public Working Group Note"
>>
>> is ambiguous. I think respec should generate:
>>
>> "This document was published by the Internationalization Working Group
>> as a First Public Working Draft. The group intends to publish this
>> document as a Working Group Note"
>>
>>
>> [2] Pubrules gives the following error:
>>
>> "Error. The W3C style sheet should be
>> http://www.w3.org/StyleSheets/TR/W3C-WG-NOTE. It is currently
>> //www.w3.org/StyleSheets/TR/W3C-WG-NOTE. "
>>
>>
>> RI
>>
>>
>
>


-- 
Richard Ishida, W3C
http://rishida.net/
Received on Tuesday, 7 May 2013 13:42:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:55:18 UTC