- From: Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2019 14:01:44 +0800
- To: Juan Sequeda <juanfederico@gmail.com>
- Cc: Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAMXe=Sooz9T_2ifNMDZQFZU0BP-=VH3e71Et9-F5s2=vV=f8cg@mail.gmail.com>
Juan and all I finally got hold of the report, courtesy of Alex P /aic.ai.wu.ac.at/~polleres/publications/bona-etal-DagstuhlReport18371.pdf As a scholar in KR, I am concerned at the suggestion that KG are being proposed as KR, and at the superficiality of the content of this report, and I am aggravated to note the complete lack of acknowledgement of the limitations of this approach. Sounds like a good example of ineptitude, inadequacy and corruption heavily influencing academic research and the field of AI KR *two cents still allowed? PDM On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 6:41 AM Juan Sequeda <juanfederico@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > Last week there was a Dagstuhl seminar on: Knowledge Graphs: New > Directions for Knowledge Representation on the Semantic Web > https://www.dagstuhl.de/en/program/calendar/semhp/?semnr=18371 > > A formal report will be coming out soon. For the mean time, some folks > have written their own reports. I'm sure folks in this community would be > interest: > > Eva Blomqvist: > http://blog.liu.se/semanticweb/2018/09/15/dagstuhl-seminar-on-knowledge-graphs/ > Paul Groth: > https://thinklinks.wordpress.com/2018/09/18/trip-report-dagstuhl-seminar-on-knowledge-graphs/ > Juan Sequeda: > http://www.juansequeda.com/blog/2018/09/18/trip-report-on-knowledge-graph-dagstuhl-seminar/ > > Cheers > > Juan > > -- > Juan Sequeda, Ph.D > www.juansequeda.com >
Received on Wednesday, 28 August 2019 06:02:48 UTC