On Mon, 15 Oct 2018 at 17:48, Martin Kaltenböck < martin.kaltenboeck@semantic-web.com> wrote: > +1 please keep the list! > Best regards, (also) Martin > +1 would it be a big deal to keep the mailing list open? (because cool mailing lists dont change) > > *Martin Kaltenböck* > CFO & Managing Partner > Semantic Web Company GmbH > > EU: +43-14021235 > US: (415) 800-3776 > https://www.poolparty.biz > https://www.semantic-web.com > > *Download E-Book*: Introducing Semantic AI > <https://www.poolparty.biz/machine-learning-meets-semantics/> > > > *Save the Date: EBDVF2018*: http://www.european-big-data-value-forum.eu/ > <https://mail.google.com/> > > > Am Mo., 15. Okt. 2018 um 17:40 Uhr schrieb Martin Hepp <mfhepp@gmail.com>: > >> +1 >> Martin >> >> --------------------------------------- >> martin hepp >> www: http://www.heppnetz.de/ >> email: mhepp@computer.org >> >> >> Am 15.10.2018 um 17:27 schrieb Axel Polleres <axel@polleres.net>: >> >> +1 to keep the list up "as is" >> >> Axel >> -- >> Dr. Axel Polleres >> url: http://www.polleres.net/ twitter: @AxelPolleres >> >> On 15.10.2018, at 17:20, John Leonard <john.leonard@incisivemedia.com> >> wrote: >> >> I prefer Linked Data as a term (I've never met anyone who understands >> what the Semantic Web is outside of people who are actually creating it >> whereas Linked Data is self-explanatory, at least in terms of getting over >> the first hurdle), but does Linked Data have close enough to the same >> meaning to satisfy everyone? >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> *From:* David Booth <david@dbooth.org> >> *Sent:* 15 October 2018 16:09 >> *To:* xueyuan; semantic-web@w3.org >> *Subject:* Re: Semantic Web Interest Group now closed >> >> On 10/15/2018 10:49 AM, xueyuan wrote: >> > This message is to inform you that the Semantic Web Interest Group >> > is now closed, [ . . . . ] >> > With the introduction of Community Groups we now encourage the >> > participants in the IG forum to >> > establish Community Groups to continue the conversations. >> >> Given that the semantic-web@w3.org email list has served the community >> very well, I think it would be helpful for continuity if a Community >> Group could take over the existing email list. Is this possible? And >> if so, does this mean that we should now create such a community group? >> >> My one hesitation in continuing with the existing list is that the >> choice of the name "Semantic Web" has long been recognized as a >> marketing mistake, so perhaps it is time to say goodbye to it. "Linked >> Data" is a substantially better term. >> >> Thoughts? >> >> David Booth >> >> >>Received on Monday, 15 October 2018 15:53:21 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 08:45:56 UTC