W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > October 2018

Re: Semantic Web Interest Group now closed

From: Martin Kaltenböck <martin.kaltenboeck@semantic-web.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2018 17:42:11 +0200
Message-ID: <CAOtzUe+Lx_A_OwYwcdtkpckLx0uSTDqCwW=wLmdLnEWyA+MtGg@mail.gmail.com>
To: mfhepp@gmail.com
Cc: Axel Polleres <axel@polleres.net>, john.leonard@incisivemedia.com, david@dbooth.org, xueyuan@w3.org, SW-forum Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
+1 please keep the list!
Best regards, (also) Martin

*Martin Kaltenböck*
CFO & Managing Partner
Semantic Web Company GmbH

EU: +43-14021235
US: (415) 800-3776
https://www.poolparty.biz
https://www.semantic-web.com

*Download E-Book*: Introducing Semantic AI
<https://www.poolparty.biz/machine-learning-meets-semantics/>


*Save the Date: EBDVF2018*: http://www.european-big-data-value-forum.eu/
<https://mail.google.com/>


Am Mo., 15. Okt. 2018 um 17:40 Uhr schrieb Martin Hepp <mfhepp@gmail.com>:

> +1
> Martin
>
> ---------------------------------------
> martin hepp
> www:  http://www.heppnetz.de/
> email: mhepp@computer.org
>
>
> Am 15.10.2018 um 17:27 schrieb Axel Polleres <axel@polleres.net>:
>
> +1 to keep the list up "as is"
>
> Axel
> --
> Dr. Axel Polleres
> url: http://www.polleres.net/  twitter: @AxelPolleres
>
> On 15.10.2018, at 17:20, John Leonard <john.leonard@incisivemedia.com>
> wrote:
>
> I prefer Linked Data as a term (I've never met anyone who understands what
> the Semantic Web is outside of people who are actually creating it whereas
> Linked Data is self-explanatory, at least in terms of getting over the
> first hurdle), but does Linked Data have close enough to the same meaning
> to satisfy everyone?
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
> *Sent:* 15 October 2018 16:09
> *To:* xueyuan; semantic-web@w3.org
> *Subject:* Re: Semantic Web Interest Group now closed
>
> On 10/15/2018 10:49 AM, xueyuan wrote:
>  > This message is to inform you that the Semantic Web Interest Group
>  > is now closed, [ . . . . ]
>  > With the introduction of Community Groups we now encourage the
>  > participants in the IG forum to
>  > establish Community Groups to continue the conversations.
>
> Given that the semantic-web@w3.org email list has served the community
> very well, I think it would be helpful for continuity if a Community
> Group could take over the existing email list.  Is this possible?  And
> if so, does this mean that we should now create such a community group?
>
> My one hesitation in continuing with the existing list is that the
> choice of the name "Semantic Web" has long been recognized as a
> marketing mistake, so perhaps it is time to say goodbye to it.  "Linked
> Data" is a substantially better term.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> David Booth
>
>
>
Received on Monday, 15 October 2018 15:44:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:42:02 UTC