Re: Semantic Web Interest Group now closed

+1 for "as is"

Cheers,
Bojan.

On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 4:48 PM Martin Kaltenböck <
martin.kaltenboeck@semantic-web.com> wrote:

> +1 please keep the list!
> Best regards, (also) Martin
>
> *Martin Kaltenböck*
> CFO & Managing Partner
> Semantic Web Company GmbH
>
> EU: +43-14021235
> US: (415) 800-3776
> https://www.poolparty.biz
> https://www.semantic-web.com
>
> *Download E-Book*: Introducing Semantic AI
> <https://www.poolparty.biz/machine-learning-meets-semantics/>
>
>
> *Save the Date: EBDVF2018*: http://www.european-big-data-value-forum.eu/
> <https://mail.google.com/>
>
>
> Am Mo., 15. Okt. 2018 um 17:40 Uhr schrieb Martin Hepp <mfhepp@gmail.com>:
>
>> +1
>> Martin
>>
>> ---------------------------------------
>> martin hepp
>> www:  http://www.heppnetz.de/
>> email: mhepp@computer.org
>>
>>
>> Am 15.10.2018 um 17:27 schrieb Axel Polleres <axel@polleres.net>:
>>
>> +1 to keep the list up "as is"
>>
>> Axel
>> --
>> Dr. Axel Polleres
>> url: http://www.polleres.net/  twitter: @AxelPolleres
>>
>> On 15.10.2018, at 17:20, John Leonard <john.leonard@incisivemedia.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> I prefer Linked Data as a term (I've never met anyone who understands
>> what the Semantic Web is outside of people who are actually creating it
>> whereas Linked Data is self-explanatory, at least in terms of getting over
>> the first hurdle), but does Linked Data have close enough to the same
>> meaning to satisfy everyone?
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> *From:* David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
>> *Sent:* 15 October 2018 16:09
>> *To:* xueyuan; semantic-web@w3.org
>> *Subject:* Re: Semantic Web Interest Group now closed
>>
>> On 10/15/2018 10:49 AM, xueyuan wrote:
>>  > This message is to inform you that the Semantic Web Interest Group
>>  > is now closed, [ . . . . ]
>>  > With the introduction of Community Groups we now encourage the
>>  > participants in the IG forum to
>>  > establish Community Groups to continue the conversations.
>>
>> Given that the semantic-web@w3.org email list has served the community
>> very well, I think it would be helpful for continuity if a Community
>> Group could take over the existing email list.  Is this possible?  And
>> if so, does this mean that we should now create such a community group?
>>
>> My one hesitation in continuing with the existing list is that the
>> choice of the name "Semantic Web" has long been recognized as a
>> marketing mistake, so perhaps it is time to say goodbye to it.  "Linked
>> Data" is a substantially better term.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> David Booth
>>
>>
>>