Re: Semantic Web Interest Group now closed

+1

Il giorno lun 15 ott 2018 alle ore 17:57 Melvin Carvalho <
melvincarvalho@gmail.com> ha scritto:

>
>
> On Mon, 15 Oct 2018 at 17:48, Martin Kaltenböck <
> martin.kaltenboeck@semantic-web.com> wrote:
>
>> +1 please keep the list!
>> Best regards, (also) Martin
>>
>
> +1 would it be a big deal to keep the mailing list open?
>
> (because cool mailing lists dont change)
>
>
>>
>> *Martin Kaltenböck*
>> CFO & Managing Partner
>> Semantic Web Company GmbH
>>
>> EU: +43-14021235
>> US: (415) 800-3776
>> https://www.poolparty.biz
>> https://www.semantic-web.com
>>
>> *Download E-Book*: Introducing Semantic AI
>> <https://www.poolparty.biz/machine-learning-meets-semantics/>
>>
>>
>> *Save the Date: EBDVF2018*: http://www.european-big-data-value-forum.eu/
>> <https://mail.google.com/>
>>
>>
>> Am Mo., 15. Okt. 2018 um 17:40 Uhr schrieb Martin Hepp <mfhepp@gmail.com
>> >:
>>
>>> +1
>>> Martin
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------
>>> martin hepp
>>> www:  http://www.heppnetz.de/
>>> email: mhepp@computer.org
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 15.10.2018 um 17:27 schrieb Axel Polleres <axel@polleres.net>:
>>>
>>> +1 to keep the list up "as is"
>>>
>>> Axel
>>> --
>>> Dr. Axel Polleres
>>> url: http://www.polleres.net/  twitter: @AxelPolleres
>>>
>>> On 15.10.2018, at 17:20, John Leonard <john.leonard@incisivemedia.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I prefer Linked Data as a term (I've never met anyone who understands
>>> what the Semantic Web is outside of people who are actually creating it
>>> whereas Linked Data is self-explanatory, at least in terms of getting over
>>> the first hurdle), but does Linked Data have close enough to the same
>>> meaning to satisfy everyone?
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>> *From:* David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
>>> *Sent:* 15 October 2018 16:09
>>> *To:* xueyuan; semantic-web@w3.org
>>> *Subject:* Re: Semantic Web Interest Group now closed
>>>
>>> On 10/15/2018 10:49 AM, xueyuan wrote:
>>>  > This message is to inform you that the Semantic Web Interest Group
>>>  > is now closed, [ . . . . ]
>>>  > With the introduction of Community Groups we now encourage the
>>>  > participants in the IG forum to
>>>  > establish Community Groups to continue the conversations.
>>>
>>> Given that the semantic-web@w3.org email list has served the community
>>> very well, I think it would be helpful for continuity if a Community
>>> Group could take over the existing email list.  Is this possible?  And
>>> if so, does this mean that we should now create such a community group?
>>>
>>> My one hesitation in continuing with the existing list is that the
>>> choice of the name "Semantic Web" has long been recognized as a
>>> marketing mistake, so perhaps it is time to say goodbye to it.  "Linked
>>> Data" is a substantially better term.
>>>
>>> Thoughts?
>>>
>>> David Booth
>>>
>>>
>>>

-- 

http://about.me/iricelino/

    " If you understand what you're doing,
           you're not learning anything. "