- From: Anthony Moretti <anthony.moretti@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 08:23:19 -0800
- To: Antoine Zimmermann <antoine.zimmermann@emse.fr>
- Cc: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>, Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>, Hugh Glaser <hugh@glasers.org>, semantic-web <semantic-web@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CACusdfS4JKa0qUGOBq5aZvHppqYZ69Pq-=Lt2hofD2eKtsfaWQ@mail.gmail.com>
*"I would like to see a place where those questions can be asked and * *answered and stay."* Those questions find a good home at www.quora.com/topic/Semantic-Web I think. Answers are voted on there too. Anthony On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 7:37 AM Antoine Zimmermann < antoine.zimmermann@emse.fr> wrote: > FWIW, in Oct. 2009, a certain Andrew Matthews created a web site for Q&A > on semantic web technologies, called Semantic Overflow > (semanticoverflow.com). The software used on this site was Stack > Exchange 1.0. It was good, it was fresh, it was lively. > > A little later, Stack Exchange launched Area 51. I seem to recall that > someone tried to get a Stack Exchange instance on semantic web topics > via Area 51 in circa 2010, but it never flew up. > > In the meantime, in 2011, Semantic Overflow was acquired by a company > called semanticweb.com (now Dataversity). semanticoverflow.com ceased to > work and redirected to answers.semanticweb.com. This new site was not > using the Stack Exchange engine. The software in place there really > sucked in comparison to SE. Slowly but surely, users of > stackoverflow.com went away from the site, using Stack Overflow more and > more instead. Quality on answers.semanticweb.com went down the floor and > the site finally shut down. > > When answers.semanticeb.com was in terminal stage (yet not clinically > dead) in ~2015, someone proposed a new semantic web Stack Exchange site > on Area 51. This one neither got the critical mass required to launch > the site for real. It was deleted. > > I find that a Q&A site on semweb tech is missing but I'm not optimistic > that it will happen on Stack Exchange anytime soon. > > Of course, you can use Stack Overflow for some technical questions on > semweb tech, you can use Open Data Stack Exchange for some Linked Open > Data questions, you can use Data Science Stack Exchange for some data > analysis questions, you can use Artificial Intelligence SE for questions > on KR & reasoning, etc. > > But you cannot use Stack Overflow for all legitimate semantic web > questions. You cannot use Open Data SE for all semantic web questions. > > Consider for example the question "What are the success stories of the > Semantic Web/Linked Data?" asked on 22nd August 2010 on Semantic > Overflow. I'd say it is a legitimate semantic web question, but > according to Stack Overflow's policy, it would probably get closed > there. And it does not relate to open data, so it should be closed too > on Open Data SE. > > > I extracted a few questions from the late answers.semanticweb.com, that > most likely would not last on SO if they were asked there: > > https://www.emse.fr/~zimmermann/QA/q.html > https://www.emse.fr/~zimmermann/QA/q2.html > https://www.emse.fr/~zimmermann/QA/q3.html > > I would like to see a place where those questions can be asked and > answered and stay. > > > > --AZ > > > > Le 07/12/2018 à 16:18, Henry Story a écrit : > > > > > >> On 7 Dec 2018, at 15:08, Hugh Glaser <hugh@glasers.org > >> <mailto:hugh@glasers.org>> wrote: > >> > >> > >> I know this was not the intention of the discussion participants, but > >> that is certainly a reasonable view to take away. > >> Maybe this is the wrong forum - is there somewhere else where I would > >> get help? > > > > Perhaps the trick for more pragmatic answers would be to open > > > > {rdf/semweb}.stackexchange.com <http://stackexchange.com> > > > > StackExchange is helpful because it forces people to ask a question > > clearly, > > and then once the answers are given and voted on, one does not need to > > answer them again. > > > > https://stackexchange.com/sites# > > > > A discussion forum such as this one tends to always reopen issues > > because it is more > > difficult to link to previous answers and there may just be too many of > > them. > > > > Henry > > > > I have found math.stackexchange.com <http://math.stackexchange.com> > very > > useful, and actually posted a semweb > > question on cstheory.stackexchange.com < > http://cstheory.stackexchange.com> > > > https://cstheory.stackexchange.com/questions/41578/what-does-the-category-of-rdf-models-look-like-in-institution-theory/41613 > > > > > > -- > Antoine Zimmermann > Institut Henri Fayol > École des Mines de Saint-Étienne > 158 cours Fauriel > CS 62362 > 42023 Saint-Étienne Cedex 2 > France > Tél:+33(0)4 77 42 66 03 > Fax:+33(0)4 77 42 66 66 > http://www.emse.fr/~zimmermann/ > Member of team Connected Intelligence, Laboratoire Hubert Curien > >
Received on Monday, 10 December 2018 16:23:54 UTC