- From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
- Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2011 08:21:06 -0400
- To: Sebastian Hellmann <hellmann@informatik.uni-leipzig.de>
- CC: semantic-web <semantic-web@w3.org>
On 10/6/2011 7:50 AM, Sebastian Hellmann wrote: > Dear list, > please clarify. I really hate not being able to answer simple questions. > Here are the inconsistencies I found: > > *S*PARQL *P*rotocol *a*nd *R*DF *Q*uery *L*anguage > from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SPARQL > (No authorative reference for the acronym found though) This is correct. > *S*imple *P*rotocol *a*nd *R*DF *Q*uery *L*anguage > from Jeffrey Pollock. Semantic Web for Dummies. John Wiley & Sons Inc., > Chichester, West > Sussex, Hoboken, NJ, 2009. I'm not sure where this came from. > *SPA*RQL *Q*uery *L*anguage for *R*DF > from http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/ This is specifically the name of the query part of SPARQL. It's not what the acronym stands for. > *S*PARQL *P*rotocol for *R*DF > from http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-protocol/ This is specifically the name of the protocol part of SPARQL. It's not what the acronym stands for. > What is the best and most recent document I should reference in an > academic paper? This I can't help you with, unfortunately. Lee > All the best, > Sebastian > > -- > Dipl. Inf. Sebastian Hellmann > Department of Computer Science, University of Leipzig > Projects:http://nlp2rdf.org ,http://dbpedia.org > Homepage:http://bis.informatik.uni-leipzig.de/SebastianHellmann > Research Group:http://aksw.org >
Received on Thursday, 6 October 2011 12:21:56 UTC