- From: Sebastian Hellmann <hellmann@informatik.uni-leipzig.de>
- Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2011 13:50:25 +0200
- To: semantic-web <semantic-web@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 6 October 2011 11:51:06 UTC
Dear list, please clarify. I really hate not being able to answer simple questions. Here are the inconsistencies I found: *S*PARQL *P*rotocol *a*nd *R*DF *Q*uery *L*anguage from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SPARQL (No authorative reference for the acronym found though) *S*imple *P*rotocol *a*nd *R*DF *Q*uery *L*anguage from Jeffrey Pollock. Semantic Web for Dummies. John Wiley & Sons Inc., Chichester, West Sussex, Hoboken, NJ, 2009. *SPA*RQL *Q*uery *L*anguage for *R*DF from http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/ *S*PARQL *P*rotocol for *R*DF from http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-protocol/ What is the best and most recent document I should reference in an academic paper? All the best, Sebastian -- Dipl. Inf. Sebastian Hellmann Department of Computer Science, University of Leipzig Projects: http://nlp2rdf.org , http://dbpedia.org Homepage: http://bis.informatik.uni-leipzig.de/SebastianHellmann Research Group: http://aksw.org
Received on Thursday, 6 October 2011 11:51:06 UTC