- From: Bob DuCharme <bob@snee.com>
- Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2011 09:02:04 -0400
- To: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
- CC: Sebastian Hellmann <hellmann@informatik.uni-leipzig.de>, semantic-web <semantic-web@w3.org>
The latest draft of http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-sparql11-protocol-20100126/ spells it out correctly, but as we can see from comparing http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-rdf-sparql-query-20050721/ with http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/, this can apparently get lost on the way to Recommendation status. Bob On 10/6/2011 8:21 AM, Lee Feigenbaum wrote: > On 10/6/2011 7:50 AM, Sebastian Hellmann wrote: >> Dear list, >> please clarify. I really hate not being able to answer simple questions. >> Here are the inconsistencies I found: >> >> *S*PARQL *P*rotocol *a*nd *R*DF *Q*uery *L*anguage >> from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SPARQL >> (No authorative reference for the acronym found though) > > This is correct. > >> *S*imple *P*rotocol *a*nd *R*DF *Q*uery *L*anguage >> from Jeffrey Pollock. Semantic Web for Dummies. John Wiley & Sons Inc., >> Chichester, West >> Sussex, Hoboken, NJ, 2009. > > I'm not sure where this came from. > >> *SPA*RQL *Q*uery *L*anguage for *R*DF >> from http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/ > > This is specifically the name of the query part of SPARQL. It's not > what the acronym stands for. > >> *S*PARQL *P*rotocol for *R*DF >> from http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-protocol/ > > This is specifically the name of the protocol part of SPARQL. It's not > what the acronym stands for. > >> What is the best and most recent document I should reference in an >> academic paper? > > This I can't help you with, unfortunately. > > Lee > >> All the best, >> Sebastian >> >> -- >> Dipl. Inf. Sebastian Hellmann >> Department of Computer Science, University of Leipzig >> Projects:http://nlp2rdf.org ,http://dbpedia.org >> Homepage:http://bis.informatik.uni-leipzig.de/SebastianHellmann >> Research Group:http://aksw.org >>
Received on Thursday, 6 October 2011 13:02:40 UTC