- From: Story Henry <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2010 22:08:28 +0200
- To: Reto Bachmann-Gmuer <reto.bachmann@trialox.org>
- Cc: nathan@webr3.org, semantic-web@w3.org, Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>, Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>, dret@berkeley.edu
On 6 Jun 2010, at 19:54, Reto Bachmann-Gmuer wrote: > > your way of specifying the type of the literal reminds me the recent > discussion started by Henry Story: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/semantic-web/2010Feb/0174.html > > following this we could also say: > > :me foaf:name [ > xsd:string 'nathan' ; > ex:sha_1 'KLSJFS9F7S9D8F7SLADFSLKDJF98SD7' . > ] . Yes, it would be possible to extend xsd:string so that this works, as explained in this email http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/semantic-web/2010Mar/0037.html But also see the follow up http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/semantic-web/2010Mar/0038.html And as we don't control the xsd: namespace, we can't tell if they will use this interpretation or the inverse. In the case of the cert ontology we can define a datatype to also be such a relation. See: http://www.w3.org/ns/auth/cert.n3 Henry
Received on Sunday, 6 June 2010 20:09:42 UTC