On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 9:44 PM, Nathan <nathan@webr3.org> wrote: > > so are we saying that all of these express the same: > > :me foaf:name 'nathan'^^xsd:string . > :me foaf:name [ owl:sameAs 'nathan'^^xsd:string . ] . this two mean the same :me foaf:name [ > xsd:string 'nathan' . > ] . this should mean the same, but while not illegal the specs do not define the meaning clearly > :me foaf:name [ > rdf:value 'nathan'^^xsd:string . > ] . > I find it hard to communicate using a term that "has no meaning on its own" (accoring to: http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema/#ch_value) > > :me foaf:name :myname . > :myname xsd:string 'nathan' . > > :me foaf:name :myname . > :myname owl:sameAs 'nathan'^^xsd:string . > these two graphs are equivalent and entail the original graph, additional they assign the uri :myname to the name > > :me foaf:name :myname . > :myname rdf:value 'nathan'^^xsd:string . > meaningless rdf:value again > > ? > > I can see the rdf:value and owl:sameAs versions expressing the same, unsure > about the xsd:string version.. > > what about.. > > :London rdfs:label [ rdf:value "London"@en, "Londres"@fr, "Лондон"@ru ]. > clearly owl:samesAs couldn't be used here, and a label is usually a literal and not a multivalued object > > or.. > > :London rdfs:label > [ rdf:value "London"@en ] , > [ rdf:value "Londres"@fr ] , > [ rdf:value "Лондон"@ru ] . :London rdfs:label "London"@en, "Londres"@fr, "Лондон"@ru. cheers, reto
Received on Sunday, 6 June 2010 20:15:24 UTC