- From: <jos.deroo@agfa.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 22:09:49 +0200
- To: olivier.rossel@gmail.com
- Cc: Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>, semantic-web-request@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF60BD5CAD.4EE254B2-ONC125770A.006E81A3-C125770A.006EC313@agfa.com>
Hi Olivier, The theories at http://eulersharp.sourceforge.net/#theories are running fine on cwm, except for 2 specific builtins; those theories are intnded to cover OWL-RL Kind regards, Jos De Roo | Agfa HealthCare Senior Researcher | HE/Advanced Clinical Applications Research T +32 3444 7618 http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/ Quadrat NV, Kortrijksesteenweg 157, 9830 Sint-Martens-Latem, Belgium http://www.agfa.com/healthcare Olivier Rossel <olivier.rossel@gmail.com> Sent by: semantic-web-request@w3.org 04/19/2010 05:44 PM To Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org> cc Subject Re: Implementing OWL2-RL with a RETE rule engine. thank you for your invaluable information. do you think that cwm's architecture is suitable as a rule engine for OWL2RL? On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 4:25 PM, Jakub Kotowski <jakubkotowski@gmx.net> wrote: > Dear Olivier, > > Olivier Rossel schrieb: >> Is there a reference list of all the rules to be implemented by a > rules engine >> to be fully compliant with RL? > The rules are given already in the spec: > http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-profiles/#Reasoning_in_OWL_2_RL_and_RDF_Graphs_using_Rules > >> Or, even better, a reference implementation of OWL2-RL for an existing >> rules engine? > > I don't know about any _reference_ implementation but there are some > initial implementations - I know Ivan Herman made one and there are > other (such as the SAOR reasoner [2]) that are close to OWL 2 RL which > partly implement the pD* [1] semantics. > > Regards, > Jakub > > > [1] http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1570826805000144 > [2] > http://axel.deri.ie/presentations/20081029saor_ISWC_btriples_challenge.pdf >
Received on Monday, 19 April 2010 20:10:26 UTC